Results appear at bottom of page

Bill McCloskey

Bill McCloskey is the founder of Only Influencers and eDataSource.

Is Social Media Replacing Good Customer Service

Is Social Media Replacing Good Customer Service

"Are companies now relying more on their social media specialists to handle customer service complaints than their customer service departments? Does it take a customer “going public” with their complaints to get proper service?"

Are companies now relying more on their social media specialists to handle customer service complaints than their customer service departments? Does it take a customer “going public” with their complaints to get proper service?

We’ve all been there: Waiting for the cable guy to show up to an appointment. In my case, I had a no-show, only to discover that my order was never in the system (computer glitch). After several attempts to get answers and progress, I took to Twitter:


Long story, short: I got a response from that tweet, and amazing treatment from Verizon’s social media team—including phone calls that they facilitated to get my order expedited and handled.

Long story, shorter: I used social media to get better customer service.

And, this isn’t the first time I’ve used Twitter to get a quicker response. And this time, it got me thinking. It doesn’t seem unusual that this is now the case. Is it simply a response to what could be described as “Squeaky Wheel Syndrome?”

Or, are we looking at social media as a leading customer service channel for the future?

There are myriad articles and blog posts about how social media can be leveraged for marketing. And yet, as this Forbes article from a couple of years ago (and numerous others) points out, customer service is being viewed as “the new marketing.”

If that’s the case, it makes sense that there’s a big place for social channels in terms of customer service. But, should it be the only place I can get good customer service? Absolutely not.

In terms of my experience with Verizon, there are some lessons to be learned:

1. If customers go public (negatively), it’s a breakdown of your customer service experience.

Using the “reasonable person” standard, most people won’t go public with their frustrations until they’re not getting answers. If they’re not getting answers through your traditional customer service channels, you’ve failed due to a breakdown. And no amount of social media presence is going to fix that larger issue.

Which brings me to my next point…

2. Social media shouldn’t replace customer service, but it certainly should augment the whole customer service experience.

I didn’t want to have to tweet about my frustration. Yet, I was extremely impressed with Verizon’s social media team. They were empowered (as all customer service reps should be) to do the research into my issue, make the necessary connections, and virtually “hold my hand” through the experience.

I even tweeted about it:


Yet, as awesome as their social media team was, I came away feeling that the social media team was more empowered than their sales teams to “make things right.” And, harkening back to my first point, I believe that’s a breakdown. You can’t depend on social media to make things right. It’s simply another component of the full customer service experience.

3. Communication is critical.

This goes for all customer service channels. If you tell me you’re going to call me at a certain time, you better call me then. Even if that phone call is simply to tell me you’re still working on the issue and you’ll call me the next day, that’s enough (provided you call me the next day).

Would I be happy? No. But would I be thinking about taking my frustration public? No—but then again, I like to think I’m a reasonable person.

4. Mistakes happen. How you handle them makes the difference between satisfied customer and angry tweeter.

Personally, I don’t like to call out brands for mistakes unless it’s particularly egregious. Others are not so nice. If I had received the calls I was supposed to, or if my order was expedited after the mistake was made, no angry tweet from me.

Simple as that.

Related Posts



No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Thursday, 20 July 2017

We know that email is a money-printing machine. (Flash to the hundreds of articles that quote the outrageous and unbeatable Return on Marketing Investment.) As I often say with clients and at conferences, “Why wouldn’t you stand in front of the email marketing machine and just put in all your money?”

List size is a metric that is ridiculous on its own. As every Email Marketer knows, it’s not about the size of the list, but the quality.

The battle over when to suppress users is age old, commonly fought between those who are focused on the size of the list, and those on the email side who understand that inactives hurt deliverability.

Your customer data is a goldmine of information just waiting to be discovered. You know that emails which reflect a customer's data are more relevant and likely to be acted on, but too many marketers stop at basics like name, gender or location.  

“The most important work in the vocabulary of advertising is TEST. Never stop testing and your advertising will never stop improving.”

David Ogilvy
Founder, Ogilvy and Mather
Considered the Father of Advertising

Sending an email marketing message is easy. But boosting bottom line performance from send-to-send -- that’s a little more difficult. The key to success here is testing.

If you’re not doing any performance testing, now’s the time to start. If you are already doing regular testing, commit to upping your game. Either way, here’s a quick walk through the process my team and I follow to help guide you.

Shown to be 40 times more effective at acquiring customers than Facebook and Twitter combined, email remains a top priority for marketers across industries. Engaging users with relevant, personalized messaging is more important than ever when it comes to this essential channel.

However, recent research shows that even the top online retailers still struggle to implement the most basic of email campaigns. We studied the top 100 e-commerce companies in the U.S., tracked three email marketing strategies over the course of two weeks and analyzed the results.

Subscribe to the Only Influencers Newsletter
  • Email Marketing News
  • Latest Email Tool Reviews
  • Email Marketing Jobs
  • Top Email Thought Leaders